New dimension of my case on October 28
Fragments from my response to Swiss Federal Court on
October 28, 2019:
.........
The
SEM uses lack of documented proof for existence threats to my life
due to publishing my politically oriented videos on Youtube as a main
reason for rejecting my asylum appeal. Here are the facts not
discussed properly during SEM's interviews.
1.
It's mostly a question of trust to my words.
But why? There is a lot of evidence why its authorities should belief
to my word. I never was lying to the SEM before, created the unique
BMoney project BMoney2017.blogspot.com/2017/07/introducing-concept-of-bdebt-and-bmoney.html
based on the honesty of my words! That's a story of my life after
all!
BMoney2017.blogspot.com/2017/09/fifith-day-of-existence-of-bmoney.html
BMoney2017.blogspot.com/2017/09/fifith-day-of-existence-of-bmoney.html
1.2.
Moreover, it's simply IMPOSSIBLE(!)
to obtain such documents in my particular case. The people who attack
never propose their visiting cards with real name and home address to
their victims. The SEM, however, fraudulently ignored that
impossibility. The fact they never raised the question whether it was
possible at all in principle, does not say in favor of their
professional skills. That fact can be interpreted as just one of two
options: Either the SEM fraudulently manipulates available
information for creating false reasons for supporting its negative
decision(s), or it believes in my ability to create a miracle to
satisfy its request for doing impossible things.
In
both cases the demand for presenting documented proof should be
excluded from consideration completely. Instead, the SEM could switch
to other related articles of Swiss Asylum Act that describes
alternative ways for implementing its "balance of probability"
cited by the SEM. I hope the SEM will do that soon!
1.3.
I Never Broke The Law!
And
that's why I appeared poor. If I broke it, my bank would return me my
money. Instead, I resisted attempts of Barclays' (the second biggest
British bank) lawyers(!) to make me criminal during infinitely long
19 years.
1.4.
I never in my life (and I am 54 now) took any banking loan!
That's
why I don't understand the attempt of the Federal Court to charge me
in advance for the job it hasn't done yet, and without any guarantee
in written the quality of that job will be high. By its essence,
that's is very similar to forcing its clients to provide a loan to
the Federal Court. And considering I know the truth about my life
story better than anyone in the world, I strongly believe I have more
than enough proofs already for granting me asylum status in
accordance with Swiss law!
1.5.
Nevertheless, the SEM focused on the point there is no documented
evidence of threats to my life. But they did not take into account
the main subject of my political activity: I was protesting against
financial robbery of the poorest part of Ukraine. ... And example of
one of my famous video on Youtube discussed with the SEM during
interview was exactly about that. That was a ideological course of
robbing Ukraine!
And
now they refer my "poverty
alone"
as a reason for denying my request for waiving court's bill and
stopping proceeding for asylum. First of all, my poverty is not the
"only" reason. Secondly, it was a main focus of my
political activity. I was trying to prevent poverty for the whole
country. But my attempts failed, corresponding political parties in
Ukraine lost that battle. And the robbery occurred. And precisely
because of that I appeared poor, together with millions of other
Ukrainians. (I lost my job because of financial crisis, new political
demands for excluding my native language from all types of
communication in Ukraine (professional, legal, mass media)).
Now
Swiss court is aware my poverty prevents me to access its legal
procedures. Nevertheless, it charges me money for the case!
In
addition to the evident uncertainty of Swiss laws on immigration,
scepticism
is
considered a good virtue
(http://bmoney2017.blogspot.com/2019/10/fundamental-dividing-point.html).
Cynicism and demanding formal proofs for everything became a main
feature of today's society. And financial problems are not exception.
Paper money is a written proof for existing debt of its creator to
its current owner, in contrast to believing to their oral words. All
digital crypto-money is the extreme form of people's disbelief into
the later. Instead, people prefer to believe into mathematics,
despite nowadays there is no valuable assets behind any kind of
money. My BMoney
project
is an attempt to make the exception: I
want other people to believe me, personally!
2.
New evidence
2.1.
The SEM demanded from me to describe only the last threat, despite
the previous cases were more alarming. .......
.................................
.................................
.................................
2.2.
From the point of view of the SEM the event described in 2.1 above
meant nothing.
From
my point of view it showed important things:
(a)
there was organized and professionally equipped group of people, not
casual passers-by;
(b)
they were obviously on the salary of certain politicians, hired for
unofficial support of their political projects;
(c)
they knew me in the face, they wanted something from me, and that
wasn't a good thing.
2.3.
I can only guess who those people were.
Obviously,
I have no precise knowledge on what was the political camp they
belonged to. It could be people who watched on Youtube my political
videos. And it could be people who watched on Youtube my videos about
financial mega conflict with the Barclays bank.
It
could be anyone, including radical left parties who could consider my
assassination for making the Barclays Infinite Debt to me lasting
forever, thus officially ending Capitalism!
I
just didn't want to be a "pawn" in someone's game!
The
fact is I was recognizable on the streets due to publishing my videos
at Internet under my real name and without hiding my face (unlike
most protesters). And some of the videos are still on Youtube
(corresponding web links with clearly marked dates and number of
viewers were provided to the SEM). And that was really dangerous.
Today
both you and the SEM punish me for that desire to be alive!
2.4.
The question on whether that threat was real or not is irrelevant in
this case. And that is especially true for the financial part of my
story due to its exceptionally big scale. According to the law, the
absence of evidence is not a decisive argument in itself for making
a negative decision about asylum status. But in my case the SEM has
made it decisive! And that was against the law!
3.
Fraudulent Separation
of
my story into tiny unrelated "atoms".
3.1.
The SEM has narrowed its reviewing range of discussion to critically
small ranges, and that approach influenced its decisions.
3.2.
By the same logic it simply parted the scale
of
financial part, the same way it previously parted my clearly
political
activity
from problems of financial
nature
with the Barclays bank, with further parting dangers to my life due
to political activity to threats from the state
only.
Ultimately, it parted from me the trust
to
my words the God gifted every real religious believer.
3.3.
In addition, the SEM separated "exceptionality" from the
whole case. And what they got in result?
The
SEM made a final conclusion about the overall case, extremely
complicated one, on one tiny detail it obtained in result of those
separations.
It's
like scientists keep obtaining more and more details about some
topic, thus understanding less and less the overall God's design
behind it. Science daily splits this infinitely complex world into
the smallest components, but unable to to understand its essence as a
whole.
3.4.
I replied to the SEM fairly that formally I never had conflicts with
the state. Rather, I said, I had conflicts with unofficial
representatives of interests of key political figures in the
government. The level of organizing their activity clearly showed
they did what they did professionally, that is, the job for certain,
financial or other kinds of material reward.
3.5.
Obviously, that was impossible for me to reveal in details their
links to specific official political figures, let alone to obtain a
documented proof about financial links with the top governmental
managers. I was shocked to find out, but the later occasion (and my
words about it during official interviews) the SEM used against me.
3.6.
Even my good life principles aimed to maintaining friendly
relationships with every person I know, was used as bad evidence
against me: I previously answered "No" to the SEM on its
question whether I had private conflicts with anyone.
Using
that answer for identifying the incident described in 2.1 above as a
purely political one appeared beyond their professional abilities: If
I clearly have no private conflicts, the only conflicts in which I
was involved then were political!
4.1.
I presented to the SEM all the facts allowing them to make a
conclusion about the scale of my financial conflict. But the SEM did
not studied those facts at all. During the first and only time they
casually inquired about it in interview on September 17, in which
that part lasted less than half an hour.
However,
the fact is, financial part of my case has became a political one!
http://BMoney2017.blogspot.com
http://BGate2018.blogspot.com
4.2.
I asked the SEM previously to reconsider its negative decision before
I send my appeal to the Federal Court, but it simply did not respond.
Thus it shifted its responsibility to the Federal Court, or whoever
who has the courage and power to deal with consequences of its
mistakes. And that's what I am doing right now. Having ZERO money,
without proper technical conditions for the success, I am fighting vs
powerful state organization(s) till the end !!! I live in the state
of permanent uncertainty about everything in this world, including
constant attempts to shake my confidence into my ethical and
religion beliefs both Swiss authorities and British banks
demonstrate. According to the most recent letter to me from the SEM,
my deportation can happen literally at ANY SECOND since October 28.
And despite all international laws and UN conventions on human
rights, SEM discusses my departure exclusively to my home country.
Despite all the threats to my life still exist there.
I
simply have no future there!!!
4.3.
As of today, the SEM and Federal Court won. The question is whether
that victory is good for Swiss society or not?
The
SEM rejected the whole case on the ground of absence of documented
proofs.
The
Federal Court went further and simply dismissed my case on the ground
of my absence of money, despite it was the direct consequence of
leaving my country where I lived 50+ years. The SEM, and now Federal
Court, did not take into account the fact I proved during SEM's
interviews: I left Ukraine being a wealthy man! Air tickets for my
numerous travels between Ukraine, Europe, and Middle East, including
airline trips within those countries, together with bills for staying
in expensive hotels in all the cities I visited, including
Switzerland, during first eight months since I needed to be away from
Ukraine were confiscated from me at the very first security search of
the SEM in Zurich (without my consent), and since then are a part of
my file Swiss authorities can access at any time. That is yet another
evidence for existing the threats to my life exclusively because of
my political activity the SEM demands from me.
4.4.
Now Swiss court is aware my poverty prevents me to access its legal
procedures. Nevertheless, it charges me for the case!
4.5.
Now the Federal Court believes I can create a Miracle and pay their
bill for 750 Fr despite I have no money at all. Then both the Court
and SEM need to trust to my words more than they did before, and
accept I always tell the truth, thus shifting the "balance of
probability" to the perfectly 100% positive decision on my case.
(Any trust assumes existence of 100% trust or distrust. People either
can be trusted, or cannot be trusted at all). Otherwise, the Court
should exclude its demand for payment that is impossible for me to
implement. Just similar to the case with SEM's belief into my
miracles I mentioned early in 1.2.
By
making a negative decision, you are building a political case.
Perfectly knowing I left Ukraine for political reasons, and now have
there no home, no job, no pension, no parents, or close relatives
capable to help me financially, Swiss authorities officially stated
they want to send me there, - TO THE DEATH!!! To DIE OUTSIDE
Switzerland! Europe is closed for me as well, as I don't have
required by the law money for touristic purposes allowed by my
passport, and no right for job there. The SEM already warned me that
is I am arrested in EU and ask for asylum or help there, I will be
sent back to Switzerland for immediate deporting to Ukraine. This is
a direct intention of the Swiss attempt of my KILLING! This is
continuation of the "Financial Genocide" I discussed in my
BMoney blog early:
4.6.
My appeal should also include protest against violating corresponding
international laws, starting from the UN Convention for the
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
5.
My complains emailed to the SEM
5.1.
I did not complain about the SEM's ... until its low effectiveness
jeopardized my existence! In particular, the first time I applied to
the SEM through email was a desperate request for allowing me to pay
the fine in my country to prevent destroying remains of my property.
The need for this special request was caused by evident abusing Swiss
Asylum Act by the SEM (see the emails in Attachment). The problem is
not resolved up to now, as SEM simply did not respond to me for the
matter.
5.2.
Another serious problem for my existence arose a week later, when I
broke my glasses. I asked for sponsorship on ordering new glasses, as
with my -5 Dioptres Myopia I had difficulties with orientation in the
space, let alone with reading and writing official documents on my
case. I call this purely technical problem a threat to my existence,
as it practically prevented proceeding with my asylum case with a
risk of direct appearing at the edge of physical survival again.
After
waiting for response during several week, by the time of my major
SEM's interview I still had no glasses. Nevertheless, I decided to go
on with proposed asylum procedures, despite feeling really
uncomfortable about that, and being unable to read related documents
during the interview, - just as a sign of respect for the SEM
governmental agency. And due to my belief a prompt outcome for my
case with further resolving international conflict with British banks
can affect future of millions people worldwide. Unlike the SEM, I set
priority for my actions exclusively in the interests of great number
of countries, starting from Switzerland.
5.3.
The third reason for my email complaints was the evidence of a
fraudulent creating artificial demand for procedural delays in the
asylum seeking process in financial interests of the SEM. I observed
the evidence in many cases, including my own one, and many witnesses
in SEM's camps can confirm similar evidences (unless they have a fear
to obtain negative decision from the SEM on their cases because of
that, just like SEM issued in my case).
......
......
......
5.4.
Although up to now the SEM has not responded to any my email, I would
like to stress that I have no intention to continue with its main
topics, unless the SEM reconsiders its negative decision on my
political asylum. I will need to become a politician then again, -
just to remain alive!
6.
New complains
6.1.
The next reason I am starting complaining about only now, since
October 28, is the SEM's refusal to provide me a medical help for the
first and only problem I dared to ask about at my first SEM's
interview almost two months early. Despite that problem includes a
STRONG
PAIN
I suffer from almost constantly, definitely preventing me to
communicate with the SEM staff properly, especially during its
official interviews, I force himself to forget about that pain for
focusing on the more important thing for my physical survival, -
progress for my asylum case, which seems does not exist anymore!
This
part of my asylum case is a dental issue with my teeth I obtained
after leaving my home country. In particular, several my teeth were
damaged because of the HUNGER and malnutrition I experienced during
almost one and a half years living in the Europe ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT
MONEY. The teeth are the first place human bodies attempt to take
missing resources in critically dangerous for existence situations.
And during last years three of them became tremendously painful and
CONSTANTLY
BLEEDING OPEN WOUND!!!
Only
after end of my major SEM's interview on September 27 I asked
interviewer for the help, and he said "From now on you should
contact our camp's assistants for the matter". But it took
almost two weeks to obtain the first (and as it appeared lately,
last) appointment to a doctor. The SEM procedure requires applying to
camp's Nurse before that. In my particular case the Nurse was always
busy. Just similar to the old joke "I always told you to come
tomorrow. Why you always come today?"
Ultimately,
that became additional reason for my emailing to the SEM about its
evidently serious managerial problems. The solution in my particular
case appeared extremely simple: I asked assistants "The Nurse is
not a dentist. What exactly you are expecting to obtain from her?"
The question took them by surprise. Indeed, what exactly they wanted
to hear to authorize proceeding for the urgent medical help? Only
then assistants made an appointment for me to the doctor directly.
But when I asked the later for a treatment, he simply refused to help
me! Instead, he proposed me to simply pull out the tooth in pain!
But
what will be at resulting empty space then? Without qualified medical
help all teeth around will become similarly damaged! Doctor did not
respond. "I am here just to pull teeth out!" he said. That
sounded like a proposal to cut damaged arm instead of treating it!
7.
Conditions
7.1.
The first problem is a lack of a quiet space with computer or other
printing device. Have you ever tried to type several pages of text on
your mobile?
Have
you ever tried to write anything having a working TV above your head
with extremely loud sound in unknown to you languages? I am trying to
do this right now!!! And at this second that is the pray in
Afghanistan (I guess). You should try (2) and (3) yourself if you
have any doubts about lack of proper conditions for communicating of
asylum seekers with Swiss authorities in written.
......
......
8.
Proposal
8.1.
I have no intention to accuse the SEM in anything. It may be they
simply did what they usually do at their level. But correct
decision to my exceptional case exists only at the exceptionally high
level!
That's why since some point I applied to State
Secretary of the SEM personally, then to President, UN, Internet
community,
and now to The Court
of Human rights
... In my situation that is quite reasonable.
8.2.
The negative decision of the SEM about my asylum status might be
perfectly legitimate from the point of Letter of Swiss Law. But I
expect from the Federal Court its observing both the Letter
and Spirit of the Law.
And have all reasons to believe the decision will be positive then!
And
if after all my case is resolved positively (and I have no doubt it
will), Swiss Federal Court will get in result the precedent
case
that it will need to consider during all similar cases in the future.
The problem for the SEM then will be their professional
inability for identifying exceptional cases
they clearly demonstrated during last months.
In
contrast, I fully realize the scale and exceptionality of my case,
and ready to fight for related problems to the END:
8.3.
The Federal court based its conclusion on the conclusion presented by
the SEM.
I
therefore ask the Federal Court to make the final decision on me case
without forwarding it back to the SEM for reviewing my case once
again. In my understanding, the Federal Court is capable to come to a
positive decision I already presented up to this point.
I
also need to mention that if the Federal Court, with all its
political wisdom of the higher level for understating the essence of
my case, decides to confirm decision of the SEM, I will need to apply
to European Court for Human Rights, the PRESS, Web blogosphere, etc.
And although right now I have no intention to accuse the SEM in
anything, including existence of its financial issues of definitely
fraudulent nature I outlined in my emails (see in Appendix), I will
need to do that in the future unless my case is resolved positively
and promptly. I worked all my life fair, and never broke the law. My
intention is to
prove the Justice Exists!
8.4.
I am asking Swiss authorities to protect me from Ukrainian problems
of political nature, rather than financial poverty. I never was poor
in my country. Severe financial problems started after I left it. And
I left it for political reasons. I simply participated in political
fight sincerely, openly, without asking for any financial reward, and
I have never obtained money for my political activity.
Today
I need to start my life anew. And Switzerland is an ideal place for
that beginning. The proposals of the SEM to start everything from
complete ZERO level in Ukraine sounds very cynical. The SEM says I am
young enough (only 54 years old), and professionally trained enough
to achieve financial success in any country, insisting that only
bankrupted Ukraine must be that "any" country in my
particular case. Even without taking into account still existing
threats to my life caused by my political activity in Ukraine, that
SEM suggestion is also cynical from financial point of view: The
exceptionally high level of Swiss salaries almost directly depends on
existence of low levels of salaries in other countries, including
Ukraine.
The
later does not have attractive internal market demand for IT jobs
anymore. Mostly because of signing financially unprofitable for
majority of its population law of Association with EU, my videos were
devoted against to. Today the only serious customers for Ukrainian IT
products are in rich countries, including Switzerland. In other
words, such respectable state organization as SEM officially demands
from me to go to Ukraine for selling my exceptional professional
experience there for the lowest possible price, thus allowing Swiss
citizen to have the highest possible profit from the resulting
formally "fair" business.
That
is, the SEM proposes me, the person who was robbed by Swiss banks
(officially licensed by the Swiss authorities under Barclays
trademark in Zurich and Geneva), and left there to die of HUNGER and
poverty with ABSOLUTE ZERO money), to pay for further improving the
quality of life of already rich Swiss citizen.
8.5.
The SEM does not use for its conclusion my related arguments, calling
them "not relevant". The list of such "not relevant"
facts is fraudulently long (see "Fraudulent Separation" in
section 3). Moreover, the SEM, and now Federal Court, use references
to opinions of some third parties that contain evidently false facts.
If
SEM really wants the truth, I will present it. But obviously, that
will require corresponding time, requiring prolongation of the asylum
process. Anyone needs that time, otherwise presenting the information
required by SEM becomes practically impossible!
8.6.
I have a lot of counter-arguments for the evidences referred by the
Federal Court. In short, they are not applicable in my particular
case. And conclusions do not correspond reality! I am ready to prove
that documentarily, but that will result in a need to review official
Swiss policy!
.........
.........
.........
See update here:
Comments
Post a Comment